Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Urology ; (12): 540-544, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-957424

ABSTRACT

Objective:To analyze the efficacy and safety of radium-223 in the treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).Methods:The clinical data of 22 patients with mCRPC treated with radium-223 in the Chongqing University Cancer Hospital from January 2021 to January 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. The average age was (70.7±1.3)years old. There were 7 cases with ECOG score of 1 and 15 cases with ECOG score of 2. There were 7 cases with grade 2 and 15 cases with grade 3 bone metastasis. For mCRPC, 1 case (4.6%) received first-line treatment, 4 cases (18.2%) received second-line treatment, 10 cases (45.5%) received third-line treatment, 4 cases (18.2%) received fourth-line treatment, and 3 cases (13.6%) received fifth-line treatment. The median time from the diagnosis of mCRPC to the start of radium-223 treatment was 29 (20, 34) months. Radium-223 (55kbq/kg) was injected intravenously every 4 weeks for up to 6 cycles. Before treatment, the median alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was 147.0 (101.8, 212.5)U/L, the median prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 44.7(20.2, 99.1)ng/ml, and 6 patients (27.3%) were complicated with grade 1-2 anemia. The median hemoglobin was 115.0 (103.8, 122.5) g/L, the average neutrophil was (3.0 ± 0.3)×10 9/L, and the average platelet was (169.8 ± 17.0)×10 9/L. The overall survival (OS), radiographic progression-free survival time (rPFS), time to PSA progression, PSA response rate, pain response rate, and time to pain progression were analyzed. Stratified analysis was carried out according to the number of treatment lines experienced before radium-223 treatment. At the same time, the main adverse reactions during radium-223 treatment were analyzed. Results:The mean number of treatment courses with radium-223 was 2.7(ranging 1 to 6), with 4 patients completing 6 courses, 12 (54.6%) completing ≥ 3 courses, and 10 (45.5%) completing < 3 courses. Thirteen patients (59.1%) were treated with radium-223 alone and 9 (40.9%) in combination with other treatments (1 of docetaxel chemotherapy, 2 of enzalutamide, 3 of olaparib, and 3 of estramustine phosphate). None of the patients in this group were treated with bisphosphonates. Ten patients (45.5%) in this group died, all due to disease progression. The median overall survival time of the 22 cases was 11.0 (2.2, 19.8) months. Three patients (13.6%), 7 patients (31.8%), 3 patients (13.6%), and 1 patient (4.5%) showed radiographic progression at 2, 3, 4, and 10 months after treatment, respectively, while the remaining 8 patients (36.4%) did not show radiographic progression during the follow-up period, and the median radiographic progression free time for the 22 patients was 4.0 (3.1, 4.9) months. There were four cases (18.2%) showed PSA response, of which three cases (13.6%) showed PSA rising again later, and one case (4.5%) showed continuous PSA decline. The median time to PSA progression for the 22 patients was 3.6 (2.2, 5.1) months. Fifteen patients (68.2%) experienced pain response at 1 month of treatment, of whom 5 (22.7%) experienced increased pain later and 10 (45.5%) experienced sustained pain relief. The median time to pain progression was 5.5 (3.5, 7.6) months in 22 patients. No patients received radiotherapy or surgery for pain, and no patients experienced fracture. In this group, 7 patients (31.8%) had a post-treatment ALP decrease ≥30% from baseline. Major adverse events during radium-223 treatment were all grade 1 to 2 events, no grade ≥3 adverse events, and no treatment discontinuers due to adverse events.Conclusions:Radium-223 resulted in high pain response rates and prolonged OS, rPFS and time to PSA progression in patients with mCRPC. Adverse effects were low during treatment. The conclusions need to be validated by further expansion of the sample size and extended follow-up.

2.
Chinese Journal of Urology ; (12): 416-422, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-957397

ABSTRACT

Objective:To evaluate the safety and efficacy of trimodality treatment (TMT) which is complete transurethral resection of bladder tumor with concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for invasive bladder cancer.Methods:From Mar. 2016 to Oct.2021, patients who were indicated of radical cystectomy (RC) but refused were enrolled to TMT treatment prospectively. Inclusive criteria were: ① the patients refused radical surgery; ② male or female, no older than 80 years; ③ no matter the tumor size, the bladder tumor be completely resected by transurethral surgery, and the hydronephrosis be improved after resecting the tumor; ④ the postoperative pathology of urothelial carcinoma; ⑤ recurrent T 1 and high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) or T 2-4a muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC); ⑥ no definitive metastasis in preoperative chest, abdominal CT or MRI; ⑦ hemoglobin ≥100 g/L, white blood cell count ≥4×10 9/L, platelet count ≥100×10 9/L, and normal liver and renal function. The exclusion criteria were: ① tumor invading bladder neck or anterior or posterior urethra; ② bladder contracture or severe urethral stricture; ③ regional lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis by imaging examination; ④ no improvement of hydronephrosis after resection; ⑤ definitive contraindications of radiotherapy or chemotherapy; ⑥ uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease or other severe diseases. After cTURBT, paclitaxel (50 mg/m 2 on Day 1 of each week) combined with cisplatin(20 mg/m 2 on day 1-2 of each week)was administered with concurrent radiotherapy (2 Gy/fraction/day) for 4 weeks. If cystoscopy and/or radiographic detected no recurrence or metastasis, the patients were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for 2 and a half weeks (total dose of 64 Gy). The side effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy during TMT were observed, the quality of life(QOL)was evaluated by FACT-P scale, and the bladder recurrence, distant metastasis and survival were assessed with imaging and cystoscopy. From March 2016 to October 2021, 79 patients with RC were enrolled, including 67 males and 12 females, aged 44-86 years. The pathology of RC was urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. There was no definitive lymph node or distant metastasis in preoperative imaging. The progress and survival after TMT and RC treatment were followed up and the survival rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. Results:Of the 30 patients who underwent TMT, including 25 males and 5 females, aged 32-76 years, there were 7 cases of cT 1 (23.3%), 19 cases (63.3%) of cT 2, 2 cases of cT 3 (6.7%)and 2 cases of cT 4(6.7%), respectively. A total of 132 adverse events of all grades of chemoradiotherapy occurred, of which only 4 were grade Ⅳ, with no bowel leakage or death due to complications. The mean scores of negative questions in FACT-P were 3.22±0.67, 1.30±0.63 and 0.87±0.69 before TMT treatment, 6 and 12 months after TMT treatment, respectively. The quality of life was significantly improved( F=129.081, P<0.001), and the rate of bladder preservation was 86.7%(26/30). Two cases underwent salvage RC(6.7%)and 2 cases died of bladder recurrence(6.7%). There were 8, 4 and 2 patients survived 4, 5 and 6 years, respectively. Seven cases (23.3%) had bladder recurrence, 3 cases (10.0%) underwent distant metastasis and 6 patients (20.0%)died after TMT because of the progression. The 1, 2 and 5 year overall survival rates by TMT treatment were 88.89%, 82.96% and 62.77%, respectively. Median follow-up was 19.5(6.8-44.5) months in the TMT group and 35.5(18.8-53.3) months in the RC group ( z=-1.998, P=0.046). Progression-free survival in the TMT and RC group were 66.7% and 80.0%( χ2=1.047, P=0.306), and the overall survival rates were 80.0% and 80.0% ( χ2=0.482, P=0.488) respectively. The difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions:The TMT is a safe and effective alternative for RC, which can improve the quality of life and control the tumor sufficiently.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL